<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Water in South Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/</link>
	<description>Igniting Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:26:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginny Douglas</title>
		<link>http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ginny Douglas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FAIR WATER USE (AUSTRALIA)
- Our river systems are not a corporate resource


FAIR WATER USE (AUSTRALIA) is a new lobby group formed by Australians from all walks of life, with a shared vision of a revived Murray-Darling basin and the sustainable environmental, community and economic benefits that would flow from its recovery.
After the recent rains in Queensland, the dams on Cubbie Station now contain over three years supply of water which will be used for the cultivation of cotton in a country ravaged by drought. 
 
Sadly, Cubbie is only one of several huge enterprises, some at least partially-owned by overseas interests, which have directly impeded the flow of a vast and essential river system. Cubbie Station is licensed to take 460,000 megalitres – more than enough to fill Sydney Harbour - extracted from the Murray-Darling catchment virtually free of charge.  There is strong evidence that dam construction continues on a huge scale.

Whilst there is no suggestion that these groups are acting dishonestly, an increasing body of public opinion considers the ecological and societal costs of their operations to be unacceptable.
 
The following statement currently appears on the Cubbie Group web-site:
 
&quot;Cubbie Group management believes that production of irrigated cotton and a viable environment can co-exist in a sustainable manner and the group has designed and managed their properties to achieve this goal.&quot;
 
In reality there is irrefutable evidence that the plight of the Murray-Darling Basin is, to a significant extent, a consequence of the cultivation of inappropriate and unnecessary crops in this the driest continent on earth. 
 
It is time to resolve this anathema. 

The fact that Australian irrigators make efficient use of their water allocations is an irrelevance. The large scale irrigation of cotton and rice continues to cause major damage to the environmental health of much of south-eastern Australia. 

On the global stage, Australian cotton and rice-growers are minor players. The Australian cotton-growing industry accounts for only 2-3% of total international production (ICAC 2005) and historically employs less than 2% of the national agricultural workforce (ABARE 2001). The indirect employment benefit is very limited, as well over 90% of Australian-grown cotton is shipped directly overseas for processing (ACSA 2004), with little value-adding occurring in this country.

Australian rice growers employ on a similar scale, an estimated 8,000 people nationwide, and produce a mere 0.2% of the global rice harvest (About Rice 2008).

The producers and their work-force would not be expected to walk off the land empty-handed. As a nation we cannot afford to let the environmental degradation continue, but with a budgetary surplus projected to exceed 15 billion dollars in the current financial year, we can afford to provide appropriate financial reparation to growers and their employees. As advocated by Mr Rupert Murdoch in November 2006:  &quot;The Government should get a billion dollars - or whatever it is - and buy back the water rights from the people who use the most”.  
 
Fair Water Use is calling upon the Prime Minister of Australia and his Government to take the necessary, decisive and constructive action to put an end to the massive sequestration of the nation’s water by the cotton and rice sector. 

We also ask the directors of cotton and rice producing enterprises - and those institutions which support them - to search their corporate consciences, to agree to cease such activities and to let the rivers run again - for the sake of the nation’s future.  
   
A nationwide campaign is currently being devised and we are in communication with a high-profile environmentalist who has expressed interest in acting as our spokesperson.

For maximum impact, we must create as large a supporter base as possible: If you would like to register your support or are able to assist with the planning and delivery of this campaign, please contact FWU coordinator Ginny Douglas at fairwateruse@internode.on.net, stating your name, current occupation and postcode.
 
Please spread the word.
 
Fair Water Use (Australia) 
PO Box 384
Balhannah
South Australia
5242]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAIR WATER USE (AUSTRALIA)<br />
- Our river systems are not a corporate resource</p>
<p>FAIR WATER USE (AUSTRALIA) is a new lobby group formed by Australians from all walks of life, with a shared vision of a revived Murray-Darling basin and the sustainable environmental, community and economic benefits that would flow from its recovery.<br />
After the recent rains in Queensland, the dams on Cubbie Station now contain over three years supply of water which will be used for the cultivation of cotton in a country ravaged by drought. </p>
<p>Sadly, Cubbie is only one of several huge enterprises, some at least partially-owned by overseas interests, which have directly impeded the flow of a vast and essential river system. Cubbie Station is licensed to take 460,000 megalitres – more than enough to fill Sydney Harbour &#8211; extracted from the Murray-Darling catchment virtually free of charge.  There is strong evidence that dam construction continues on a huge scale.</p>
<p>Whilst there is no suggestion that these groups are acting dishonestly, an increasing body of public opinion considers the ecological and societal costs of their operations to be unacceptable.</p>
<p>The following statement currently appears on the Cubbie Group web-site:</p>
<p>&#8220;Cubbie Group management believes that production of irrigated cotton and a viable environment can co-exist in a sustainable manner and the group has designed and managed their properties to achieve this goal.&#8221;</p>
<p>In reality there is irrefutable evidence that the plight of the Murray-Darling Basin is, to a significant extent, a consequence of the cultivation of inappropriate and unnecessary crops in this the driest continent on earth. </p>
<p>It is time to resolve this anathema. </p>
<p>The fact that Australian irrigators make efficient use of their water allocations is an irrelevance. The large scale irrigation of cotton and rice continues to cause major damage to the environmental health of much of south-eastern Australia. </p>
<p>On the global stage, Australian cotton and rice-growers are minor players. The Australian cotton-growing industry accounts for only 2-3% of total international production (ICAC 2005) and historically employs less than 2% of the national agricultural workforce (ABARE 2001). The indirect employment benefit is very limited, as well over 90% of Australian-grown cotton is shipped directly overseas for processing (ACSA 2004), with little value-adding occurring in this country.</p>
<p>Australian rice growers employ on a similar scale, an estimated 8,000 people nationwide, and produce a mere 0.2% of the global rice harvest (About Rice 2008).</p>
<p>The producers and their work-force would not be expected to walk off the land empty-handed. As a nation we cannot afford to let the environmental degradation continue, but with a budgetary surplus projected to exceed 15 billion dollars in the current financial year, we can afford to provide appropriate financial reparation to growers and their employees. As advocated by Mr Rupert Murdoch in November 2006:  &#8220;The Government should get a billion dollars &#8211; or whatever it is &#8211; and buy back the water rights from the people who use the most”.  </p>
<p>Fair Water Use is calling upon the Prime Minister of Australia and his Government to take the necessary, decisive and constructive action to put an end to the massive sequestration of the nation’s water by the cotton and rice sector. </p>
<p>We also ask the directors of cotton and rice producing enterprises &#8211; and those institutions which support them &#8211; to search their corporate consciences, to agree to cease such activities and to let the rivers run again &#8211; for the sake of the nation’s future.  </p>
<p>A nationwide campaign is currently being devised and we are in communication with a high-profile environmentalist who has expressed interest in acting as our spokesperson.</p>
<p>For maximum impact, we must create as large a supporter base as possible: If you would like to register your support or are able to assist with the planning and delivery of this campaign, please contact FWU coordinator Ginny Douglas at <a href="mailto:fairwateruse@internode.on.net">fairwateruse@internode.on.net</a>, stating your name, current occupation and postcode.</p>
<p>Please spread the word.</p>
<p>Fair Water Use (Australia)<br />
PO Box 384<br />
Balhannah<br />
South Australia<br />
5242</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Jensen</title>
		<link>http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Jensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The messages from the forum on Water Security for South Australia were grim, convincing and urgent, and raise once again the question of why we can&#039;t get the urgent action that is needed. Today is the anniversary of the Prime Minister&#039;s urgent meeting of state Premiers to discuss the dire state of the Murray-Darling Basin, and it appears that no real progress has been made in the last 12 months. 
We need to take back the over-allocated water, at least 17% according to Rod Oliver, and we need to do it now, according to David Paton. The Prime Minister&#039;s grand plan has been scuttled by the National Party and Victoria ruling out compulsory acquisition of water. Mike Young says there is not enough water (by orders of magnitude) available from &#039;willing sellers&#039; to fix the problem. 
As a start, we need to find another name for &#039;environmental flows&#039; -- they are getting lots of bad press and seen as competing with people, rather than being essential to maintain a healthy working river. Then we can lobby for water to be shared with the river, instead of the current zero allocation. How about &#039;riverfresh&#039; or &#039;survival flows&#039;? &#039;rivercare&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The messages from the forum on Water Security for South Australia were grim, convincing and urgent, and raise once again the question of why we can&#8217;t get the urgent action that is needed. Today is the anniversary of the Prime Minister&#8217;s urgent meeting of state Premiers to discuss the dire state of the Murray-Darling Basin, and it appears that no real progress has been made in the last 12 months.<br />
We need to take back the over-allocated water, at least 17% according to Rod Oliver, and we need to do it now, according to David Paton. The Prime Minister&#8217;s grand plan has been scuttled by the National Party and Victoria ruling out compulsory acquisition of water. Mike Young says there is not enough water (by orders of magnitude) available from &#8216;willing sellers&#8217; to fix the problem.<br />
As a start, we need to find another name for &#8216;environmental flows&#8217; &#8212; they are getting lots of bad press and seen as competing with people, rather than being essential to maintain a healthy working river. Then we can lobby for water to be shared with the river, instead of the current zero allocation. How about &#8216;riverfresh&#8217; or &#8216;survival flows&#8217;? &#8216;rivercare&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stathy: Industry Perspective on the Future of Water in South Australia &#171; LitFuse</title>
		<link>http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Stathy: Industry Perspective on the Future of Water in South Australia &#171; LitFuse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 10.25 The Future of Water in South&#160;Australia  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10.25 The Future of Water in South&nbsp;Australia  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karlene Maywald: The Future of Water in South Australia &#171; LitFuse</title>
		<link>http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karlene Maywald: The Future of Water in South Australia &#171; LitFuse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Water Research Cluster of the University of Adelaide hosted a public forum on the Future of Water in South Australia on 24 October 2007. I have created a more detailed blog on this event. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Water Research Cluster of the University of Adelaide hosted a public forum on the Future of Water in South Australia on 24 October 2007. I have created a more detailed blog on this event. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Oliver on the Future Health of the River Murray &#171; LitFuse</title>
		<link>http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod Oliver on the Future Health of the River Murray &#171; LitFuse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Water Research Cluster of the University of Adelaide hosted a public forum on the Future of Water in South Australia on 24 October 2007. I have created a more detailed blog on this event. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Water Research Cluster of the University of Adelaide hosted a public forum on the Future of Water in South Australia on 24 October 2007. I have created a more detailed blog on this event. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Paton on the Death of the Coorong &#171; LitFuse</title>
		<link>http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Paton on the Death of the Coorong &#171; LitFuse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.litfuse.com.au/2007/10/25/the-future-of-water-in-south-australia/#comment-16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a public forum on the Future of Water in South Australia on 24 October 2007. I have created a more detailed blog on this event. The presenters [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a public forum on the Future of Water in South Australia on 24 October 2007. I have created a more detailed blog on this event. The presenters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

